< previous page page_649 next page >

Page 649
For (8,2) and (2,8) configurations, m¢ = 1.
Study 9.5 Open-Queue Study of Various Disk Array Configurations
We are now ready to compare the various concurrent disk configurations (and compare our results with Reddy's simulation). For this part of the study, we assume an open-queue model, and we compute the total response time based on that model.
We use the Reddy workload defined earlier as:
d87111c01013bcda00bb8640fdff6754.gif
70% 1-block file access.
d87111c01013bcda00bb8640fdff6754.gif
30% accesses uniformly distributed over 216-block file accesses.
First, we need to compute the service and transfer times for each configuration. Assuming 16 disks, we have from the preceding discussion:
Configuration
Ts
Ttransfer
(1,1)
26.3
8.8
(16,1)
22.7
6.2
(8,1)
23.1
5.8
(4,1)
23.9
5.0
(1,16)
18.1
0.6
(1,8)
18.6
1.1
(1,4)
19.7
2.2
(2,8)
20.8
1.1
(8,2)
21.6
4.4

In order to compute r, we must find m, the effective number of independent disk drives. Reddy's simulation assumes that the disks are uniformly accessed. Therefore:
0649-01.gif
where
0649-02.gif
and mq = 1 if q = 1.
Now we can approximate Reddy's workload distribution overall with a co-efficient of variance of c2 = 0.15. Using tills and the previously discussed corresponding m factor for each configuration, we have:

 
< previous page page_649 next page >